
Total Views
3K
Read Time
18 min read
Updated On
23.07.2026
Introduction
Best Free WYSIWYG HTML Editors in 2026 (10 Ranked + Tested)
Best free WYSIWYG HTML editors 2026: 10 tested. Eddyter free tier wins on modern features. Quill, Jodit, TipTap Core, Lexical, Editor.js compared honestly.
TL;DR
Best free WYSIWYG HTML editors 2026: 10 tested. Eddyter free tier wins on modern features + AI. Quill (BSD) for prototypes. Jodit (MIT) best truly-free. TipTap Core best headless.

Content
Best Free WYSIWYG HTML Editors in 2026 (10 Ranked + Tested)
Free WYSIWYG HTML editors in 2026 look identical on the surface — MIT license, GitHub stars, install-and-go. But not all "free" editors are equal. Some are free forever with clean licenses. Others have limited free tiers that push you to paid plans within weeks. Some advertise as free while hiding key features behind licenses. Some are actively maintained. Others are technically alive but haven't shipped a real update since 2022.
This guide tested 10 free WYSIWYG HTML editors in 2026 honestly — Quill, Jodit, TipTap Core, Lexical, Editor.js, Slate, Trix, ProseMirror, Draft.js, Summernote — plus Eddyter's free tier. Every editor was ranked on 6 criteria that actually matter: license clarity, HTML output quality, framework support, maintenance status, feature completeness, and real cost including build time.
The short answer: For most modern React and Next.js projects, Eddyter's free tier delivers the cleanest HTML output with 6-framework support and 30-min setup. Quill is the fastest-to-ship truly-free option (BSD, 15-min setup) but development stalled in 2022. TipTap Core is the most flexible for headless UI builds (MIT, 2-4 weeks). Skip Draft.js and Summernote — both are legacy in 2026.
🎥 See modern free editor setup: What is Eddyter? Why Developers Are Switching in 2026
Free Editor Comparison Table (10 Options at a Glance)
Here's how the 10 free WYSIWYG HTML editors compare in 2026:
Editor | License | Setup Time | Working UI | AI Included | HTML Output Quality | Framework Support | Active 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eddyter Free | 🟡 Free tier | 30 min | ✅ Complete | ✅ Yes (limited) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Semantic | React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Laravel (6) | ✅ Active |
Quill | 🟢 BSD | 15 min | ✅ Basic | ❌ No | ⭐⭐⭐ Decent | Vanilla + wrappers | ⚠️ Stalled since 2022 |
Jodit | 🟢 MIT | 30 min | ✅ Complete | ❌ No | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Clean | Vanilla, TypeScript-first | ✅ Active |
TipTap Core | 🟢 MIT | 2-4 weeks | ❌ Build it | ❌ No | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Semantic | React, Vue, Svelte (3) | ✅ Very active |
Lexical | 🟢 MIT | 4-6 weeks | ❌ Build it | ❌ No | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Semantic | React-first (community others) | ✅ Meta-backed |
Editor.js | 🟢 Apache 2.0 | 1-2 hours | ✅ Blocks | ❌ No | JSON (convert to HTML) | Vanilla + wrappers | ✅ Steady |
Slate | 🟢 MIT | 4-6 weeks | ❌ Build it | ❌ No | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Configurable | React-first | ✅ Active |
Trix | 🟢 MIT | 15 min | ✅ Basic | ❌ No | ⭐⭐⭐ Basic | Vanilla (Basecamp-made) | ⚠️ Slow updates |
Draft.js | 🔴 Free but deprecated | Hours | ❌ Build it | ❌ No | ⭐⭐⭐ Verbose | React | ⛔ Meta-deprecated |
Summernote | 🟢 MIT | 15 min | ✅ Basic | ❌ No | ⭐⭐ Bootstrap-heavy | jQuery-based | ⛔ Legacy/stalled |
ProseMirror | 🟢 MIT | 2-3 months | ❌ Build it | ❌ No | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Semantic | Vanilla (build framework) | ✅ Active |
License Legend:
- 🟢 Fully free open source (MIT, Apache, BSD)
- 🟡 Free tier of paid product
- 🟠 Free non-commercial only (GPL)
- 🔴 Free with hidden costs or deprecated
The pattern: truly free editors (🟢) require either weeks of build time (frameworks) or lack modern features. Eddyter's free tier is the fastest path to a working editor with modern features — but it's a paid product's free tier, not fully open source.
For paid editor comparisons, see Best WYSIWYG HTML Editors 2026 (Free + Paid) and 11 Best HTML Editors 2026.
How We Tested These 10 Free Editors
Every editor was installed fresh in a Next.js 15 + React 19 project and tested against the same criteria. No paid placements. Real developer testing.
Testing Environment
- Framework: Next.js 15.3 (App Router)
- React version: React 19.1
- Node.js: 22.4
- Browser: Chrome 132 (main), Safari 17.6 (mobile check)
- Test date: June 2026
- Test project: Standard SaaS content management app
6 Testing Criteria
1. License Clarity
Read the license file. Confirmed commercial-use rights. Flagged any "free with strings" catches. Rated 🟢/🟡/🟠/🔴 by license type.
2. Setup Speed
Measured from npm install to a working editor rendering in the browser. Timed with a stopwatch. Includes toolbar and basic formatting.
3. HTML Output Quality
Typed the same test document (headings, lists, links, bold, italic, code block, table). Compared the resulting HTML for semantic markup, inline style bloat, and portability. Rated ⭐-⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐.
4. Framework Support
Tested React 18/19 integration. Checked Vue 3, Angular 17, Svelte 4/5 support. Confirmed first-class vs community wrapper status.
5. Feature Completeness
Checked for toolbar, slash commands, image uploads, tables, code blocks, AI features, real-time collaboration, mobile UX, accessibility.
6. Real Cost (Including Build Time)
Free license doesn't mean free. Calculated 3-year TCO including engineering time to build missing features (UI, AI, collab, mobile). Numbers in tables below.
What We Didn't Test
- Editors with license fees for commercial use (Froala, ImperaviRedactor)
- Editors that require a self-hosted server (CKEditor Cloud, TinyMCE Cloud)
- Editors requiring GPL-derivative code releases (rare in the "free WYSIWYG" space)
The 10 Best Free WYSIWYG HTML Editors (Ranked)
Here's the honest ranking. Each editor evaluated against the 6 criteria above.
#1 Eddyter Free Tier — Best Modern Free WYSIWYG in 2026
License: 🟡 Free tier of paid product | Built on: Lexical (Meta) | Setup: 30 minutes | Best for: React/Next.js SaaS prototypes with modern needs
Eddyter's free tier includes the full editor UI, slash commands, tables, image upload, and basic AI credits — perfect for prototypes, MVPs, and low-traffic production apps. Not fully open source, but the most modern free path to a working editor.
Free tier includes:
- ✅ Complete working UI (toolbar, slash commands, tables)
- ✅ Basic AI features (limited monthly credits)
- ✅ 100 MB media storage
- ✅ 100 editor loads per month
- ✅ 1 API key
- ✅ Eddyter branding required
- ✅ All 6 frameworks supported (React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Laravel)
Quick setup:
jsx
Strengths:
- ✅ Cleanest semantic HTML output (Lexical-based)
- ✅ Working UI in 30 minutes — no build time
- ✅ AI features included (rare among free options)
- ✅ 6-framework support (widest of any free editor)
- ✅ Meta-Lexical foundation (active development guaranteed)
Limitations:
- ❌ Free tier requires Eddyter branding (paid removes it)
- ❌ 100 editor loads/mo cap on free tier
- ❌ Not open-source — you're on Eddyter's roadmap
Upgrade path: $12/mo Starter (removes editor load limits + more storage), $59/mo AI Pro Managed (full AI credits).
Documentation: eddyter.com/docs
#2 Quill — Best Truly Free Basic Editor
License: 🟢 BSD (fully free) | Setup: 15 minutes | Best for: Prototypes with basic formatting
Quill has been the most popular free WYSIWYG editor for a decade. BSD license means genuinely free forever. Setup is 15 minutes. But active development largely stalled since 2022, and modern features are missing.
Strengths:
- ✅ Genuinely free forever (BSD)
- ✅ Very lightweight bundle
- ✅ Simple API — easy to drop in
- ✅ Working UI included (toolbar)
- ✅ Setup in 15 minutes
- ✅ Predictable Delta JSON output
Limitations:
- ❌ Development largely stalled since 2022
- ❌ Quill 2.0 progress unclear
- ❌ React 19 compatibility issues via community wrappers
- ❌ No AI features
- ❌ No slash commands
- ❌ No advanced tables (cell merging, resizing)
- ❌ Copy-paste handling has known issues
- ❌ Limited mobile UX
Best for: Prototypes, hackathons, or throwaway MVPs.
For deeper Quill analysis, see Quill Alternative and TipTap vs Quill 2026.
#3 Jodit — Best Modern TypeScript-First Free Editor
License: 🟢 MIT (fully free) | Setup: 30 minutes | Best for: TypeScript-first projects needing complete free WYSIWYG
Jodit is the underrated pick in 2026. MIT license, TypeScript-first design, active maintenance, and a complete working UI included. Doesn't have Quill's install base but ships more modern features.
Strengths:
- ✅ Fully free MIT
- ✅ TypeScript-first codebase
- ✅ Complete working UI (toolbar, file upload, image editing)
- ✅ Actively maintained (regular releases)
- ✅ Clean HTML output
- ✅ Advanced tables built in
- ✅ File manager included
Limitations:
- ❌ Vanilla JS core (React/Vue integration via wrappers)
- ❌ Smaller community than Quill or TipTap
- ❌ No AI features
- ❌ Documentation less polished than TipTap
- ❌ Bundle size heavier than Quill
Best for: TypeScript teams that want a complete free WYSIWYG without paid features.
#4 TipTap Core — Best Free Headless Framework
License: 🟢 MIT core (paid Cloud Platform separate) | Setup: 2-4 weeks for production | Best for: Custom React/Vue/Svelte editors
TipTap Core is the editor library — free under MIT. TipTap Cloud Platform (paid $49-$999/mo) is optional. If you skip the Cloud Platform, TipTap Core is one of the best free React frameworks available.
Strengths:
- ✅ MIT-licensed core (fully free)
- ✅ 100+ pre-built extensions (largest ecosystem)
- ✅ First-class React, Vue, Svelte bindings
- ✅ Active weekly development
- ✅ Semantic HTML output
- ✅ Built on ProseMirror (rigorous foundation)
Limitations:
- ❌ Headless — you build the entire UI (2-4 weeks)
- ❌ AI Toolkit requires paid Cloud Platform
- ❌ Cloud free plan removed in June 2025
- ❌ Requires
immediatelyRender: falsein Next.js App Router - ❌ Document-based Cloud pricing scales unpredictably if you enable it
Best for: Teams with 2-4 weeks of engineering time who want maximum UI control.
For TipTap analysis, see TipTap Pricing Explained 2026 and TipTap Alternative.
#5 Lexical — Best Meta-Backed Free Framework
License: 🟢 MIT (fully free) | Setup: 4-6 weeks for production | Best for: High-performance React foundations
Lexical is Meta's open-source editor framework — the same foundation Eddyter uses. Free under MIT. Powers Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp Web. But it's a framework, not an editor.
Strengths:
- ✅ Fully free (MIT)
- ✅ Meta-backed (guaranteed long-term maintenance)
- ✅ Powers Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp Web
- ✅ Cleanest React-first architecture (2022)
- ✅ Excellent performance
- ✅ Semantic HTML output
Limitations:
- ❌ Framework, not editor — build everything
- ❌ 4-6 weeks minimum to production-grade
- ❌ ~30 official packages vs TipTap's 100+
- ❌ Documentation less tutorial-heavy than TipTap
- ❌ Vue/Svelte support via community wrappers only
Best for: Teams building performance-critical React apps with 4-6 weeks of senior engineering bandwidth.
For Lexical analysis, see Best Lexical Alternative 2026 and Lexical vs TipTap 2026.
#6 Editor.js — Best Free Block-Based Editor
License: 🟢 Apache 2.0 (fully free) | Setup: 1-2 hours | Best for: Notion-style content platforms
Editor.js takes a block-based approach — every paragraph, heading, image is a separate block. JSON output natively. Working UI included.
Strengths:
- ✅ Fully free (Apache 2.0)
- ✅ Working UI out of the box
- ✅ Clean block-based model (Notion-style)
- ✅ Structured JSON output
- ✅ Lightweight (~50KB)
- ✅ 30+ official block tools
Limitations:
- ❌ Block-based only — not traditional WYSIWYG
- ❌ JSON output requires HTML conversion
- ❌ No inline formatting flexibility
- ❌ No AI features
- ❌ Limited table features
- ❌ React integration via community wrappers
Best for: Notion-style content platforms with structured JSON needs.
For Editor.js analysis, see Editor.js vs TipTap 2026.
#7 Slate — Best React-First Free Framework Alternative
License: 🟢 MIT (fully free) | Setup: 4-6 weeks | Best for: React teams needing unique document models
Slate is a completely customizable React framework. Gives you total control over document model, rendering, and behavior. Like Lexical, it's a framework — not an editor.
Strengths:
- ✅ Fully free (MIT)
- ✅ React-native design
- ✅ Fully customizable document model
- ✅ Plugin-based architecture
- ✅ Good for unusual editing needs
Limitations:
- ❌ Not an editor — it's a toolkit
- ❌ Very steep learning curve
- ❌ Breaking changes between versions historically
- ❌ No UI, no toolbar, no AI
- ❌ 4-6 weeks minimum build time
Best for: React teams already invested in Slate with unique document requirements.
For Slate analysis, see Eddyter vs Slate 2026.
#8 Trix — Basecamp's Free Editor
License: 🟢 MIT (fully free) | Setup: 15 minutes | Best for: Rails/Basecamp-style apps needing simple editing
Trix is Basecamp's WYSIWYG editor, released in 2015. Simple, clean, works out of the box. Slower development pace but still maintained.
Strengths:
- ✅ Fully free (MIT)
- ✅ Working UI in 15 minutes
- ✅ Simple API
- ✅ Basecamp-backed (won't disappear)
- ✅ Native HTML output
Limitations:
- ❌ Slow update cadence (Basecamp doesn't prioritize it)
- ❌ Vanilla JS (React wrappers are community)
- ❌ No AI features
- ❌ No slash commands
- ❌ Basic formatting only
- ❌ Not designed for modern React apps
Best for: Ruby on Rails apps or simple prototypes.
#9 Draft.js — Skip (Meta-Deprecated)
License: 🔴 Free but Meta-deprecated | Status: Maintenance mode
Draft.js was Meta's original React editor framework. Officially in maintenance mode — Meta now recommends Lexical as the replacement.
Skip for new projects in 2026. If you're stuck on Draft.js, plan migration to Lexical (Meta's official path) or Eddyter (built on Lexical, ships in 10 min).
For migration paths, see Best Lexical Alternative 2026.
#10 Summernote — Skip (jQuery Legacy)
License: 🟢 MIT | Status: Legacy, jQuery-based
Summernote is a Bootstrap-based WYSIWYG editor built on jQuery. Popular in the 2015-2018 era. In 2026, it's legacy technology.
Strengths (historical):
- ✅ Fully free (MIT)
- ✅ Bootstrap-native styling
Skip because:
- ❌ jQuery-based (2026 stacks avoid jQuery)
- ❌ Verbose HTML with heavy inline styles
- ❌ No modern framework support
- ❌ Slow updates
- ❌ No AI, no slash commands, no modern UX
Best for: No new projects. Migration candidate for existing Summernote installations.
Which Free Editor to Choose Based on Your Use Case
Use this decision framework to pick the right free editor for your project:
If you want to ship in 30 minutes...
Pick Eddyter's free tier. Working editor with AI in half an hour. Free tier suits prototypes, MVPs, and low-traffic apps. Upgrade to $12/mo when you hit limits.
If you're on a hackathon deadline...
Pick Quill. BSD license, 15-minute setup, working UI. Ship tonight, worry about long-term later. Skip if you need React 19 stability.
If you're TypeScript-first and want fully free...
Pick Jodit. MIT license, TypeScript-first, complete UI, modern features. Best truly-free WYSIWYG with active maintenance in 2026.
If you have 2-4 weeks and need custom React UI...
Pick TipTap Core. MIT-licensed core with 100+ extensions. Skip TipTap Cloud unless you need managed collaboration.
If you need Meta-scale performance for React...
Pick Lexical. Same framework Meta uses in Facebook Messenger. 4-6 weeks build time, but performance ceiling is highest.
If you're building Notion-style block content...
Pick Editor.js. Apache 2.0, block-based UX, JSON output. Working UI in 1-2 hours.
If you need unique document model in React...
Pick Slate. React-first framework with full customization. 4-6 weeks build time.
If you're on Ruby on Rails...
Pick Trix. Basecamp-backed, simple, works with Rails patterns.
If you're on jQuery legacy...
Migrate. Summernote is legacy — move to Jodit or Eddyter free tier.
If you're on Draft.js...
Migrate to Lexical or Eddyter. Meta officially recommends Lexical. Eddyter (built on Lexical) offers fastest migration path.
For framework-specific picks, see:
- Best Rich Text Editor for React 2026
- Best Rich Text Editor for Next.js App Router 2026
- Best Rich Text Editor for Vue 2026
- Best Rich Text Editor for Angular 2026
Real Cost of "Free" Editors (3-Year Numbers)
Free license doesn't mean free product. Here's the actual 3-year cost including build time for a typical SaaS:
Editor | License | Build Time Cost | Maintenance | AI Integration | 3-Year Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eddyter Free (with $59/mo upgrade year 1) | $0-$708/yr | $0 (30 min) | Included | Included | $1,416 |
Quill (with custom UI patches + AI + collab) | Free (BSD) | $15,000 | $3,000/yr | $5,000 + $1,200/yr | $44,000 |
Jodit (with AI integration + mobile UX) | Free (MIT) | $8,000 | $2,400/yr | $5,000 + $1,200/yr | $27,600 |
TipTap Core (custom UI + AI) | Free (MIT) | $22,000 | $3,600/yr | $5,000 + $1,200/yr | $54,400 |
Lexical (build from framework) | Free (MIT) | $45,000 | $4,800/yr | $5,000 + $1,200/yr | $63,800 |
Editor.js (custom blocks + AI) | Free (Apache) | $25,000 | $3,000/yr | $5,000 + $1,200/yr | $58,800 |
Slate (build everything) | Free (MIT) | $30,000 | $3,600/yr | $5,000 + $1,200/yr | $54,400 |
Trix (build modern React wrapper) | Free (MIT) | $8,000 | $2,400/yr | $5,000 + $1,200/yr | $27,600 |
Eddyter's free tier + $59/mo upgrade saves $26,000 to $62,000 over 3 years compared to building on any free framework. Plus all the engineering time freed up.
For build-vs-buy analysis, see Why Building Your Own Editor Is a Startup Killer.
Free Editor License Types Explained
Understanding license types prevents surprise costs later:
🟢 Fully Free Open Source
MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD licenses. Use commercially forever. No strings. Community-maintained. Editors: Quill (BSD), Jodit (MIT), TipTap Core (MIT), Lexical (MIT), Editor.js (Apache), Slate (MIT), Trix (MIT), Summernote (MIT), ProseMirror (MIT).
🟡 Free Tier of Paid Product
Free for small use. Paid for production scale. Often has feature gates or usage limits. Editors: Eddyter Free (100 editor loads/mo cap), Froala Trial (not tested — commercial only).
🟠 Free for Non-Commercial Only
GPL or similar copyleft. Free for personal use. Commercial use requires derivative code release or paid license. Editors: CKEditor 5 GPL version (not in this list — commercial license required for closed-source apps).
🔴 Free with Hidden Costs or Deprecated
Free download, but production needs paid licenses OR deprecated. Editors: Draft.js (Meta-deprecated), Summernote (legacy).
Why Free Editors Still Cost Money
Most "free" editors have hidden costs. Here's the reality:
1. Build Time = Money
TipTap Core is MIT-free, but production-grade UI takes 2-4 weeks of senior engineering. At $200/hour, that's $16,000-$32,000. Lexical takes 4-6 weeks — $32,000-$48,000. These aren't "free."
2. Missing Features = Custom Development
Quill has no AI. No slash commands. No advanced tables. Adding these requires custom development. Custom code needs maintenance forever.
3. No Managed Collaboration
Free editors don't include Y.js collaboration servers. Real-time collab requires you to self-host infrastructure — days of setup plus monthly hosting costs.
4. Legacy Migration Costs
Free legacy editors (Draft.js, Summernote) will eventually need migration. Migration is often 2-4 weeks of work.
5. No Support Contracts
When free editors break, you're on your own. Stack Overflow answers and GitHub issues are the only support paths. Time = money.
The counterintuitive lesson: paid editors are often cheaper than free ones when total cost is honest.
Why Eddyter Free Tier Beats Most Free Editors in 2026
Three reasons Eddyter's free tier is the best free WYSIWYG HTML editor for most modern React and Next.js projects:
1. Working UI in 30 Minutes (Not Weeks)
Quill and Jodit ship with UI included but limit modern features. TipTap Core and Lexical are free but need 2-6 weeks of build time. Eddyter's free tier includes toolbar, slash commands, AI, tables, and mobile UX — set up in 30 minutes with the free tier.
2. Only Free Editor With AI Included
Every other free editor requires you to integrate OpenAI or Anthropic yourself. That's $5,000+ in build cost. Eddyter's free tier includes basic AI credits — enough to prototype AI features without integration work.
3. Multi-Framework Reach (6 vs 3 Native Frameworks)
Free editors typically target one framework well. Eddyter's free tier works across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and Laravel — one API key, all stacks. Perfect for teams running mixed frontend/backend architectures.
For broader Eddyter comparisons, see Eddyter vs TipTap 2026 and Eddyter vs Quill 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best free WYSIWYG HTML editor in 2026?
For most modern React and Next.js projects, Eddyter's free tier delivers the best combination of working UI (30-min setup), AI features included, 6-framework support, and clean semantic HTML output. For truly free open-source, Quill (BSD, 15-min setup) is the most popular but development stalled in 2022. Jodit (MIT) is the best actively-maintained fully-free option. TipTap Core (MIT) is best for custom headless React/Vue/Svelte UIs but takes 2-4 weeks to build.
Are there any completely free WYSIWYG HTML editors that don't require paying eventually?
Yes. Quill (BSD), Jodit (MIT), TipTap Core (MIT), Lexical (MIT), Editor.js (Apache 2.0), Slate (MIT), and Trix (MIT) are all fully free forever with permissive licenses that allow commercial use. Draft.js is also MIT but Meta-deprecated — skip for new projects. Summernote is MIT but legacy jQuery — skip too.
Which free WYSIWYG HTML editor is best for React in 2026?
For 30-minute setup with modern features, Eddyter's free tier is best (30-min, AI included, 6 frameworks). For custom UI control, TipTap Core is best (MIT, 100+ extensions, 2-4 weeks build). For Meta-scale performance, Lexical is best (MIT, 4-6 weeks build). Quill's React integration is via community wrapper with React 19 compatibility issues — avoid for React 19 apps.
Is Quill still worth using in 2026?
Quill is still worth using for prototypes, hackathons, or throwaway MVPs where 15-minute setup matters and basic formatting is enough. For production apps that need to grow, Quill's stalled development since 2022 makes it a risky pick — React 19 compatibility issues, no AI features, no slash commands, no advanced tables. Consider Jodit (fully free, actively maintained) or Eddyter's free tier (modern features included) instead.
Which free WYSIWYG HTML editors have AI built in?
Only Eddyter's free tier includes AI features (chat, autocomplete) with limited monthly credits. Every other free WYSIWYG editor — Quill, Jodit, TipTap Core, Lexical, Editor.js, Slate, Trix — has no built-in AI. You'd need to integrate OpenAI or Anthropic yourself, which typically costs $5,000+ in custom development plus ongoing API fees.
What does "free tier" mean for editors like Eddyter?
Eddyter's free tier is a limited-usage tier of a paid product — free forever, but with caps (100 MB storage, 100 editor loads/month, 1 API key, Eddyter branding required). Perfect for prototypes and low-traffic apps. Upgrade paths: $12/mo Starter (removes limits + more storage), $29/mo Pro (white-label), $59/mo AI Pro Managed (full AI credits). Unlike fully open-source editors (MIT/BSD/Apache), you're bound by Eddyter's roadmap and pricing.
Should I skip legacy editors like Draft.js and Summernote in 2026?
Yes. Draft.js is officially in maintenance mode — Meta recommends Lexical as the replacement. Summernote is jQuery-based, which most 2026 stacks avoid. Both are legacy technology that will make your codebase harder to maintain. If you're already on Draft.js, migrate to Lexical (Meta's official successor) or Eddyter (built on Lexical). If you're on Summernote, migrate to Jodit (actively maintained MIT) or Eddyter's free tier.
What's the real cost of using a "free" WYSIWYG editor in a production app?
Free license doesn't mean free product. TipTap Core (MIT) costs $22,000-$32,000 in build time to reach production. Lexical (MIT) costs $45,000-$60,000. Even Quill (BSD) needs $15,000+ in custom UI patches for modern features. Add ongoing maintenance and AI integration, and 3-year TCO for "free" editors typically runs $27,000-$63,000. Eddyter's free tier + $59/mo upgrade runs $2,124 over 3 years — often the cheapest total path.
Ready to Ship With a Free Editor?
Stop struggling with legacy free editors or spending weeks building on free frameworks. Drop Eddyter's free tier into your React or Next.js app today and get modern WYSIWYG with AI in 30 minutes.
👉 Try Eddyter free at eddyter.com
📚 Read the docs
🎥 Watch the intro video | Watch the 30-min setup guide

Written by
Shreya Taneja
Project Manager

